History of:

USAWOA

Warrant Officer Corps.

172nd Infantry Brigade


2nd Stryker Cavalry Regiment







Origin and Early History (1940 & Earlier)

 

    The rank of warrant officer has a long history. For example, evidence suggests that Napoleon used warrant officers as communications links between his commissioned officers and the Soldiers.

    The military grade of “warrant officer” dates back two centuries before Columbus, during the fledgling years of the British Navy. At that time, nobles assumed command of the new Navy, adopting the Army ranks of Lieutenant and Captain. These royal blood officers often had no knowledge of life on board a ship, let alone how to navigate such a vessel or operate the guns. They often relied on the technical expertise and cooperation of a senior sailor who tended to the technical aspects of running the ship and operating the cannons. These sailors, sometimes referred to as ‘Boat Mates’ or ‘Boswans Mates’ became indispensable to less experienced officers and were subsequently rewarded with a Royal Warrant. This Royal Warrant was a special designation, designed to set them apart from other sailors, yet not violate the strict class system that was so prevalent during the time.

    In the U.S. Navy, warrant officers have traditionally been technical specialists whose skills and knowledge were an essential part of the proper operation of the ship. The Navy has had warrant officers among its ranks, in some form or another, since its conception. For the U.S. Army, we can trace the lineage of the warrant officer back to 1896, specifically to the Headquarters Clerk (later designated the Army Field Clerk).

    The Act of August 1916 authorized the Army Field Clerk (formerly Headquarters Clerk) and the Field Clerk, Quartermaster Corps (formerly Pay Clerk). Although initially considered civilians, the Judge Advocate General eventually determined that they held military status. The Act of July 1918 introduced the rank and grade of warrant officer. It established the Army Mine Planter Service in the Coast Artillery Corps and directed that warrant officers serve as masters, mates, chief engineers, and assistant engineers of each vessel. There were three varying levels of pay authorized.

Photo of 8 of the original 40 mine planters appointed in 1922. Taken at Fort McPherson, GA.
A group of the original mine planters.

    In World War I, the Coast Artillery Corps was responsible for mine defenses in major ports. Vessels, ranging in size from small motorboats to 1,000-ton ocean-going ships, laid and maintained minefields. Conflict between Soldiers and civilian employees who manned these vessels revealed the need to ensure that military personnel manned the vessels. 

    Officially, the birth date of the Army Warrant Officer Corps is 9 July 1918, when Congress established the Army Mine Planter Service as part of the Coast Artillery. This action assured that exclusively Army personnel manned the vessels. The Army opened a school to train their mariners at Fort Monroe, Virginia, commanded by an officer who had graduated from the Naval Academy.

    The official color of the warrant officer corps is brown, as warrant officers in the Mine Planter Service wore simple bands of brown cloth on their uniform sleeves as their insignia of rank. Warrant officers served in four positions aboard the vessels: masters, mates, chief engineers and assistant engineers. Masters wore four bands. Deck officers also wore an embroidered brown fouled anchor above the braid, while engineer officers wore an embroidered brown three-bladed propeller in a similar position.

    The Act of 1920 expanded use of warrant officers, authorizing appointment of warrant officers in clerical, administrative, and band leading activities. This Act authorized 1,120 warrant officers, provided for appointments in the Army-at-large rather than in specific branches and established warrant officer assignments in various headquarters and tactical units. Perhaps the most significant motive for the expansion was 

". . . a desire to reward enlisted men of long service and also to reward former commissioned officers of World War I who lacked either the educational or other eligibility requirements necessary for continuance in the commissioned status."

    In 1921, warrant officers were excluded from performance of summary court officer, defense counsel, officer of the day, and assistant adjutant because enlisted personnel were prohibited from performing those same duties. During this time, only one pay grade existed except in the army Mine Planter Service.

    Warrant officers of the Tank Corps first wore the distinctive insignia approved on 12 May 1921. It consists of an eagle rising with wings displayed, standing on two arrows and enclosed in a wreath. It was adapted from the great seal of the United States, with the arrows symbolizing the military arts and science.

Eagle Rising
"The Eagle Rising"

"An eagle rising with wings displayed standing on a bundle of two arrows, all enclosed in a wreath."

    In 1922, the warrant officer strength authorization dropped from 1,120 to 600, exclusive of the number of Army Mine Planter Service warrant officers and Army Bandmasters. Consequently, there were no warrant officer appointments other than Bandmasters and Army Mine Planter Service personnel between 1922 and 1935. Laws subsequent to 1922 authorized the appointment of additional classes of personnel with certain qualifications, above the 600 authorizations.

    In 1936, the Army held competitive examinations to replenish lists of eligibles for Regular Army appointment. The Army appointed warrant officers against vacancies from this 1936 list until the beginning of World War II.

    In 1939, warrant officers who were qualified as pilots were declared eligible for appointments as air corps lieutenants in the Regular Army.

    In 1940, warrant officers began serving as disbursing agents.

At this time, warrant officer appointments began to occur in significant numbers for the first time since 1922. However, a large number of warrant officers transferred to active duty as commissioned officers, causing a continuing decrease in warrant officer strength until 1942

[ Back to Table of Contents ]


Expansion (1941-1947)

    The Act of 1941 created two grades, chief Warrant Officer and Warrant Officer junior grade, and authorized flight pay for Warrant Officers whose duties involved aerial flight. The Act of August 1941 also provided:

    1) Appointments up to one percent of the Regular Army enlisted strength.

    2) Assignment of Warrant Officers to duties as prescribed by the Secretary of the Army.

    3) Warrant Officers with duties normally performed by a commissioned officer are vested with the power to perform those duties under regulations prescribed by the President.

    4) Warrant Officers serving as assistant adjutant have the power to administer oaths for the purposes of administration.

    5) As a follow-up to the provisions stated in paragraph 8-2a(2), Executive Order 8938, 10 November 1941, stated that 

"Whenever the duties assigned to Warrant Officers of the Army include the command of stations, units, or detachments, the disbursement and administration of funds, including the certification of vouchers and payrolls, the issuance of travel orders, bills of lading, and transportation requests, the receipt for, and accountability for, and administration of property, the certification and verification of official papers, or the performance of similar routine administrative duties, they shall be vested with all the powers usually exercised by commissioned officers in the performance of such duties."

    Now the Secretary of the Army could prescribe the assignment of Warrant Officers.

    After a competitive examination in 1942, the Army appointed temporary Warrant Officers in approximately 40 occupational areas. For the first time, Warrant Officers performed functions other than mine planting, band leading, administration, and supply. These new functional areas were not incorporated into the Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) structure but were later identified by the number and title of the examination. Later than same year, authority to approve temporary Warrant Officer appointments was delegated to major commanders.

Warrant officer insigniaFlight officer insigniaDistinguishing bars of gold and brown were approved as Warrant Officer insignia of grade on 11 January 1942. In September 1942, with the adoption of the warrant grade of flight officer, an ultramarine blue and golden-orange bar was approved as an insignia of grade.

In November 1942, the War Department defined the position of the Warrant Officer in the rank order as being above all enlisted ranks and immediately below all commissioned officers.

    During the remainder of World War II, Warrant Officers were appointed by quota in a decentralized fashion by major commanders. These decentralized appointments were not competitive in an Army wide sense, although generally, examinations were used as a screening device. The selection process usually consisted of a board appearance for those who met statutory requirements and screening criteria.

    The appointment of women as Warrant Officers was authorized in January 1944, and the first women were appointed in March of that year. At the conclusion of World War II, there were 42 women Warrant Officers on active duty. Today, over 1,300 women serve as Warrant Officers in all branches except Special Forces.

Warrant Officer appointments virtually ceased after World War II because of military downsizing, dissatisfaction with the decentralized appointment process, and confusion about the purpose of Warrant Officers. It had become apparent that the decentralization of appointments, based onto he premise that each commander best knew his or her own needs, resulted in inconsistent selection practices and served to confuse the Warrant Officer's role and function.

    Warrant Officers were filling 40 different occupational specialties by early 1946 and approximately 60 specialties by 1951.

    The Warrant Officer strength of the Regular Army stood at 775 on 30 June 1939. When peak personnel strength was reached during World War II, in May 1945, nearly 57,000 Warrant Officers (including flight officers of the Air Force) were on active duty.

    In 1946, the 40 Warrant Officer functional areas were incorporated into the same MOS structure as that used for commissioned officers. At about the same time, the concept of using the Corps as an incentive rather than a reward was instituted. It was determined that the rank of Warrant Officer was to be a capstone rank into which enlisted personnel could routinely expect to advance in connection with the Enlisted Career Guidance Program. The use of Warrant Officer grade as a reward before World War II and its use as an incentive after World War II both resulted in Warrant Officers' duties and responsibilities being largely interchangeable with those of junior commissioned officers and senior enlisted personnel.

[ Back to Table of Contents ]

Consolidation (1948-1956)

    During 1948 and 1949, competitive examinations were held to appoint or select for appointment approximately 6,000 regular Army Warrant Officers. Appointments were made in 47 MOSs and four special (classified) occupational areas. Selections and appointments numbered approximately 4,500 from the general Army examinations of 1948 and approximately 1,500 from the unit administrator examinations of 1949. Approximately half of these 6,000 appointees and selectees were Commissioned Officers on extended active duty with Reserve commissions.

    In late 1948, a considerable number of term of enlistment (TOE) duty positions were established for Warrant Officers. However, budgetary limitations did not allow the additional appointments necessary to fully implement this broadened concept of Warrant Officer use.

    The Career Compensation Act of 1949, provided two new pay rates for Warrant Officers. The designations of Warrant Officer Junior Grade and Chief Warrant Officer were retained; however, the grade of Chief Warrant Officer was provided with pay rates of W2, W3 and W4.

    In 1950, approximately 900 Warrant Officer appointments were made using eligibility lists established by the 1948 and 1949 competitive examinations.

    In 1951, major commanders were once again allowed to confer temporary Warrant Officer appointments. As a result, they appointed approximately 1,400 Warrant Officers (temporary appointments) in 60 MOSs.

    In March 1952, budgetary limitations forced termination of Warrant Officer appointments.

    In August 1953, the Army force reduction plan following cessation of hostilities in Korea called for the Warrant Officer corps to be reduced by one-third to meet FY 1954 budget authorization of approximately 12,400. But because of the inflationary impact of using the rank as an incentive, there was both a surplus of total Warrant Officers as well as a critical shortage of Warrant Officer positions and personnel in the missile, electronics, and aviation specialties. A concept consistent with Army requirements was needed if the Warrant Officer Corps was to survive.

    The inception of Warrant Officer Flight Program in 1953, lead to the training of thousands who later became helicopter pilots during the Vietnam War.

[ Back to Table of Contents ]

Revitalization (1957-1975)

    In January 1957, a completely new Warrant Officer concept was announced that:

    1) Affirmed the need for the Warrant Officer and the continuation of the Warrant Officer Corps.

    2) Stipulated that Warrant Officer status would not be considered as a reward or incentive for enlisted men or former Commissioned Officers.

    3) Approved the following Warrant Officer definition:

"The Warrant Officer is a highly skilled technician who is provided to fill those positions above the enlisted level which are too specialized in scope to permit the effective development and continued utilization of broadly-trained, branch-qualified Commissioned Officers."

Recent Warrant Officer Program

    The present Warrant Officer Program was announced in DA Circular 611-7 on 12 April 1960. In addition to stating the 1957 definition of the Warrant Officer, this publication also outlined utilization policies, criteria for selection of Warrant Officer positions, and instructions for conversion to the current Warrant Officer MOS system.

    In 1966, a study group formed at the Department of the Army to develop a formal Warrant Officer Career Program that would be responsible to future Army requirements while concurrently offering sufficient career opportunities to attract high quality personnel. The study group examined all aspects of the Warrant Officer Corps and made a number of recommendations in areas such as pay, promotion, utilization, and education. To implement these recommendations, various actions were initiated to provide more career opportunities for Warrant Officers.

    In 1966 the first Warrant Officer Professional Development Program was published in Department of the Army Pamphlet 600-11.

    During the 6 years following its initial development, several significant improvements were made into the Warrant Officer Career Program.

    In 1967, below-the-zone selection for promotion to grades CW3 and CW4 was implemented. The initiation of early selection for promotion to the grades of CW3 and CW4 was for a limited number of Warrant Officers with exceptional performance records.

    In 1968, the Regular Army Program was reopened to Warrant Officer applicants after having been closed for 20 years. Additional changes reduced service eligibility criteria and simplified application procedures.

    Since 1968, the military education available to Warrant Officers has been remarkably expanded. Before then, there was no formal progressive military schooling program for Warrant Officers. A tri-level education system was established by the end of 1972 that provided training at the basic or entry level for Warrant Officers in 59 occupational specialties, at the intermediate or mid-career level for 53 specialties, and at the advanced level for 27 specialties.

    In 1973, the three levels of training were redesignated from basic, intermediate, and advanced to entry, advanced and senior, respectively. Simultaneously, after successful testing of the concept, the Warrant Officer Senior Course (WOSC) was established to provide all Warrant Officers with access to the highest level of professional education. In 1973, the Department of the Army a plan to close the gaps in the Warrant Officer military education system by expanding and modifying the existing advanced courses to accommodate all Warrant Officer specialties.

    Civil schooling opportunities were also increased during this period. The educational goal for Warrant Officers was upgraded from 2-year college equivalency to an associate degree and Warrant Officers were authorized entry into fully funded civil school programs. To promote achieving this goal, cooperative degree programs began to be established in the colleges and universities near the installations conducting the Warrant Officer career courses. In consonance with increased educational opportunities, duty positions requiring Warrant Officers with master's degrees were validated for the first time by the Army Education Requirements Board.

    To forecast and control their assignment and training opportunities, Warrant Officers were incorporated into the HQDA Projected Requisitioning Authority (PRA), a management tool long used for Commissioned Officers, but not applied to Warrant Officers until 1975.

  1975 welcomed the establishment of the Warrant Officer Division at the Army's Personnel Command, providing a centralized career management center for all Warrant Officers (excluding those working in Staff Judge Advocate and Medical Corps specialties). 1975 also saw the Warrant Officer civilian education program (degree completion) authorized and funded by Department of the Army.

    By the close of 1975, the Army's capability for professionally developing the Warrant Officer Corps had been significantly expanded and Warrant Officers were being offered developmental opportunities not available to their predecessors.

[ Back to Table of Contents ]

Transformation (1975-Today)

    In 1974, Warrant Officer Division was created at MILPERCEN (Military Personnel Center), now PERSCOM, to provide centralized career management for all but Judge Advocate General and Medical Corps Warrant Officers, who continued to be managed independently by their own proponencies.

    1978, Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve Warrant Officers not on active duty were integrated into the Army's professional development program. This was necessary to satisfy the recognized need for qualified, highly trained individuals available to augment the active Warrant Officer corps rapidly in time of emergencies.

    In 1984, the Chief of Staff chartered a Total Warrant Officer Study (TWOS) and the Vice Chief of Staff directed that all direct appointments cease and that a Warrant Officer Candidate Course be established at Fort Sill.

    Recommendations from the TWOS study were eventually approved by the Army Chief of Staff and resulted in a new definition of the Warrant Officer as:

"An officer appointed by warrant by the Secretary of the Army based upon a sound level of technical and tactical competence. The warrant officer is the highly specialized expert and trainer who, by gaining progressive levels of expertise and leadership, operates, maintains, administers, and manages the Army's equipment, support activities, or technical systems for an entire career."

More about the current definition

    A whole new era for Warrant Officers began when the Chief of Staff, Army chartered the Department of the Army Total Warrant Officer Study Group in September 1984. This was the first Department of the Army-level comprehensive study of Warrant Officer management from preappointment to retirement. It spanned the entire Army, both active and reserve components. Implemented recommendations included coding of positions in authorization documents by rank grouping and automatic Regular Army (RA) integration at the CW3 level.

    The culmination of TWOS was the passage of the Warrant Officer Management Act (WOMA) as part of the FY 1992 and 1993 National Defense Authorization Act and approval of the Warrant Officer Leader Development Action Plan (WOLDAP) in 1992. On 5 December 1991, WOMA went into effect. WOMA is a major revision of title 10, USC, and is the current basis for management of the active duty Warrant Officer Corps. Key provisions of the law include--

    1) A single promotion system for Warrant Officers.

    2) Tenure requirements based upon years of Warrant Officer service.

    3) The grade of CW5.

    4) Authorization for the Secretary of the Army to convene boards to recommend Warrant Officers for selective mandatory retirement.

    WOLDAP was approved by the Chief of Staff, U.S. Army, on 27 February 1992. WOLDAP is a total Army plan designed to ensure both active and reserve Warrant Officers are appointed, trained, and utilized to a single standard. Key provisions of WOLDAP include:

    1) An accession goal of 8 years or less time in service for Warrant Officer candidates.

    2) Establishment of a comprehensive Warrant Officer education system.

    3) Conditional appointment to WO1 upon successful completion of Warrant Officer candidate school.

    4) Civilian education goals of an associate degree before eligibility for promotion o CW3 and a bachelors degree before eligibility for promotion to CW4.

    5) Establishment of the Warrant Officer Career College (WOCC)

    6) Pinpoint assignments for CW5s.

The Army Training and Leader Development Panel (ATLDP)

Released on August 22, 2002, focused on training and leader development requirements for Warrant Officers as the Army transforms to the Future Force. This study (Phase III), the third conducted by the ATLDP, is part of the largest self-assessment ever done by the Army

 

      a.  The Warrant Officer study concludes the Army must make fundamental changes in the Warrant Officer cohort to support full spectrum operations. At the heart of the change is a complete integration of Warrant Officers into the larger officer corps, a process begun in the 1980s but never completed. Specifically, the study concludes that the Army needs to clarify the roles of Warrant Officers, then make changes to their professional development, training and education, and manning.

 

       b.  The study recommended 63 changes to improve the training, manning and professional development of Warrant Officers.  If fully implemented, these recommendations represent the most significant changes within the Army Warrant Corps since its inception in July of 1918.

 

       c.  Implemented changes:

  • On 9 July 2004, the 86th anniversary of the Army Warrant Officer Corps, all Warrant Officers will wear the insignia appropriate to their branch.  They will no longer wear the Eagle Rising.

  • Also on 9 July 2004, the rank insignia of CW5 will change to one similar to other services, a silver bar with a single black band in the center.

  • WO Division and Officer Division merger

  • Consolidation of OES and WOES

  • Inclusion in DA Pam 600-3, Commissioned Officer Development and Career Management

[ Back to Table of Contents ]

 



 Table of Contents

1940 & Earlier

1941-1947

1948-1956

1957-1975

1975-Today





Follow the Nord-Bayern Silver Chapter on
Facebook and Twitter to keep updated on the latest meetings, events, raffles and fundraising information.
 This site is best viewed on the standard 1024x768 DoD resolution. It has also been designed to accomodate higher resolutions.